Reported by Lynn Cave
September 18, 2002
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) is capitalizing on other technologies
besides imaging to look for ways to screen people who are at high
risk for developing lung cancer.
The estimated 90 million current and former smokers in this country
make up the biggest population at risk for lung cancer. But even
if all smokers quit today, there would still be lung cancer cases
for 50 years due to the damage already caused. Currently, less than
30 percent of lung cancers are diagnosed at an early stage, when
conventional wisdom suggests they ought to be more curable. Because
spiral computerized tomography (CT) detects smaller lesions than
X-rays, some scientists believe it will catch tumors before they
spread outside the lung. But small is not always early when it comes
to lung cancer, says Denise Aberle, M.D., University of California
Los Angeles, co-director of the NCI-funded National Lung Screening
Trial launched in September 2002. Some tumors have already metastasized
by the time they can be found on spiral CT scans. NLST will help
determine if spiral CT is better than X-rays in reducing deaths
due to lung cancer by detecting tumors early.
Both spiral CT and X-rays will detect small lesions. The challenge
will be how to tell the difference between a deadly tumor and a
scar or other noncancerous abnormality.
Answers may come from an array of new biological tools. Vanguard
technologies to detect changes in genes, such as polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) assays and microarrays, are being employed to find
lung cancer markers. In addition, proteomics-markers defined by
protein expression patterns-which holds promise for early detection
of ovarian and prostate cancers, may also prove useful for lung
and other cancers. Gene or protein marker detection may then be
used in tandem with imaging studies to help clinicians determine
if someone has lung cancer.
A New Look at Sputum
The new tools are allowing scientists to re-examine the usefulness
of clinical samples, such as sputum. Twenty years ago, researchers
conducted large lung screening trials that involved the collection
of sputum to see if it contained cells that would lead to the detection
of cancer. The conclusion of these trials was that sputum wasn't
a useful screening tool. But sputum examination in those days relied
on skilled people looking at cells in the samples through a microscope-a
subjective technique that could leave experts disagreeing about
whether cellular features indicated that cancer was present in the
patient.
Today, tools that detect changes at the molecular level take the
observer out of the picture, providing a much clearer answer about
whether cancer gene markers or proteins produced by cancer genes
are present. Research has shown that some molecular markers are
present in sputum three or more years prior to diagnosis of lung
cancer. Scientists are also probing for molecular changes in the
blood.
So far, though, none of the markers in sputum, blood, or other
samples such as bronchial lavage-a "wash" obtained by delivering
a solution into the lungs via a fiberoptic bronchoscope and sucking
it out again-is sensitive and specific enough to be useful for mass
screening. But changes in the field of markers may bring them closer
to being used for routine screening.
As in other cancers, scientists studying lung cancer are shifting
their focus to develop a panel of markers, rather than rely on just
one. "There's a big graveyard of markers that haven't panned out,"
says William Bigbee, Ph.D., who is part of the NCI-funded Early
Detection Research Network and the NCI-supported Lung Cancer Specialized
Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) at the University of Pittsburgh
Cancer Institute.
Beyond the Marker Graveyard
Constructing a screening tool that employs many markers may be
the ticket to making screening of sputum, blood, or other samples
commonplace. With current advances in technology, it may soon be
possible to probe for many common cancer-causing genetic changes
in biological specimens of asymptomatic individuals. Possible candidate
genes to comprise such a panel include: p16, MGMT (06-methylguanine-DNA
methyltransferase), hnRNP A2/B1 (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein
A2/B1), K-ras, and p53. Genes located on chromosomes 3p and 9p are
also known to be involved in lung cancer. The first two genes, p16
and MGMT, contain many extra methyl groups and other hypermethylated
genes are also being examined for a link to lung cancer.
Lung Cancer SPORE researchers-Steven Belinsky, Ph.D., Lovelace
Respiratory Research Institute in Albuquerque, NM, and James Herman,
M.D., and Stephen Baylin, M.D., at The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center
in Baltimore, MD, and colleagues from University of Colorado Cancer
Center in Denver, CO-are conducting a study examining a particular
set of hypermethylated genes in the sputum of 3,000 smokers. The
participants, who enter the trial without lung cancer, are being
followed over time to see if they develop cancer. So far, the markers,
which are detected using a methylation-specific PCR assay, have
proved predictive in about 100 people who have already developed
lung cancer. "The results are very promising," says Dr. Baylin.
Although no markers are ready yet to be taken to the level of testing
that spiral CT is undergoing in NLST, the new molecular tools, especially
proteomics, have the potential to be scaled up to handle the demand
for lung screening tests and could be economical, as well.
Proteomics is particularly promising because protein markers can
be detected from the amount of blood serum obtained with a finger
prick, and some NCI-supported scientists, including Dr. Bigbee,
are investigating this approach for early detection of lung cancer.
But, some scientists say serum markers may appear too late in the
development of lung cancer-by the time a tumor has developed blood
vessels into which to shed tumor cells, it is already big enough
to metastasize. Lung tumors develop blood vessels when they grow
to approximately 3 millimeters, about the minimum size that can
be detected on spiral CT.
Other researchers say cancer-associated proteins found in the blood
may not come directly from the tumor. The body has a complex response
to tumors, and the immune system gears up to fight cancer before
a tumor metastasizes, says Dr. Bigbee. So what may be reflected
in serum are proteins from an immune response to the cancer rather
than proteins from the tumor itself.
Scale Up
Scaling up the new molecular tools to handle millions of screening
tests per year will not be easy, says Jim Mulshine, M.D., of NCI's
Center for Cancer Research. But even if the markers don't work for
early detection, they may be useful for identifying individuals
at the highest risk for developing lung cancer. In addition, markers
may help in monitoring the effects of new and experimental treatments
or for monitoring for recurrence of the tumor.
Markers may also support individualized treatment in the future,
says Dr. Mulshine. Recently published microarray studies reveal
that lung cancer is actually several different diseases at the molecular
level. The ability to characterize the diseases with molecular markers
may eventually make it easier to give a patient the most effective
treatment for his or her tumor.
Additional Reading:
Hirsch, FR, Franklin, WA, Gazdar, AF, Bunn, PA, Jr. Early Detection
of Lung Cancer: Clinical Perspectives of Recent Advances in Biology
and Radiology. Clin Can Res 2001;7:5-22.
Mulshine, JL, Cuttitta, F, Tockman, MS, De Luca, LM. Lung Cancer
Evolution to Preinvasive Management. Clin Chest Med 2002;23(1):37-48.
Palmisano, WA, Divine, KK, Saccomanno, G., et al. Predicting Lung
Cancer by Detecting Aberrant Promoter Methylation in Sputum. Cancer
Res 2000;60:5954-5958.
Petricoin, III EF, Ardekani, AM, Hitt, BA, Levine, PJ, Fusaro,
VA, Steinberg, SM, Mills, GB, Simone, C, Fishman, DA, Kohn, EC,
Liotta, LA. Use of Proteomic Patterns in Serum to Identify Ovarian
cancer. Lancet 2002;359:572-577.
Other Information:
NCI Lung Cancer Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPORE):
http://spores.nci.nih.gov/current/lung/lung.html
NCI Early Detection Research Network (EDRN): http://www3.cancer.gov/prevention/cbrg/edrn/
### |